Shoplyfter - Hazel Moore Case No 7906253 S Patched

Regarding , the appellate panel determined that intent to deceive must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecution’s intent was to preserve evidence, not to mislead. Consequently, the statutory violation claim was rejected .

The denied the motion to suppress, finding that the patch constituted a derivative work of the original footage and that the prosecution had complied with the chain‑of‑custody requirements. The judge allowed the video to be shown to the jury, subject to a limiting instruction that the footage had been digitally reconstructed. shoplyfter hazel moore case no 7906253 s patched